MY SWEETENED LAWLESS THOUGHTS

Here, in the wild gardens of my mind, I dance,

Radically, untamed, free from the chains of the norm,

Creating the space where boundaries dissolve,

Where imagination is the only law that governs.


I paint with the colours of my body’s freedom,

Each stroke defies the rules of a world too small,

Embracing the power of what I can do,

Limited only by the scope of my mind’s reach.

I care not for society’s narrow lanes,

For I’ve torn down the walls they built around me,

Liberated from the fears that once held me tight,

Now I soar on the wings of my unchained thoughts.

I know the strength in reigning in the storm,

Mastery over my desires and whims,

Making choices rooted in wisdom’s soil,

Unafraid of the consequences I own.

No hand can steer the course of my life’s ship,

For I am the captain, charting my way,

Yet I anchor in the harbour of decency,

Guided by the stars of intellect and grace.

I know that time is a fleeting gift,

A precious jewel in life’s short thread,

And as I walk this path, I remember,

That soon, my footprints will fade in the sand.

But until then, I will live as I choose,

Radical, lawless, sweet in my defiance,

Knowing that in a world of countless voices,

Mine will echo true, bound only by my soul’s command.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

WHY WOMEN WON'T GO TO HEAVEN

By DUL JOHNSON 1. I want to start from the very beginning – the opening; What does a reader want in an opening? First is to have the writer introduce the main character(s) and intimate something about the situation she/they are in-i.e the conflict that will provide dramatic twine for the story; (2) to get us interested and involved; and (3) to do it all in a timely fashion, i.e. it stops being an opening as soon as possible and gets on with the story.... ‘WHY WOMEN WON’T MAKE IT TO HEAVEN’ succeeded in doing just that...it introduces us to the characters, showed us where they were, and showed that they’ve gotten concerns or problems. And it does all these in the first page; starting with a long paragraph and quick five short paragraphs. After this, the story is up and running as the conflicts between a husband and his wife, then similar issues between other husbands and their wives escalates with disastrous consequences. The second story is more leisurely, comparably. Reading throug...
Read more

TOPIC TODAY: is on Raising Activists or Bystanders; Teaching children to speak up. Do we teach children to speak when something is wrong? Do you encourage your children to question unfairness, even when that unfairness comes from you? When you see someone in trouble, do you look away to "stay safe," or do you look for a safe way to help? The Big Question: If every child in the next generation chose to be an "Upstander," what kind of society would we be living in twenty years from now?

Image
The evening air at Evakings Bar carries the faint scent of diesel and suya, but the conversation at the corner table is focused on the heavy silence of the streets. Jide is recounting a story from his commute—a scene where a conductor was harassing a young passenger while everyone else looked out the window. ​"I wanted to say something," Jide admits, staring into his drink. "But I thought, 'Why look for trouble?' We tell our kids to stay out of 'grown folks' business' so they stay safe. But aren't we just raising a generation that watches the world burn from a safe distance?" ​Jennifer looks up, her expression sharp. "Safe for now, Jide. But when we raise 'Bystanders,' we are building a society where no one is protected. We’ve confused 'minding your business' with 'ignoring injustice.' If we don't teach them to be 'Upstanders' now, who will speak for them when they are the ones in the conductor'...
Read more

TOPIC TODAY: is on Grandparents Interfering with ParentingTwo generations, two philosophies — who wins? Do you view your parents as "Interfering" or as "Volunteers" who need better job descriptions? Can you distinguish between an "Outdated Safety Risk" and a "Different Parenting Style"? The Big Question: If you "win" the argument but lose the grandparent’s support, who is the real loser—you or the child?

Image
The night at Evakings Bar has reached that soulful hour where the playlist shifts from Afrobeats to Highlife, and the conversation moves from politics to the kitchen table. Ola is nursing a drink, looking at a flurry of WhatsApp messages from his mother. ​"She’s at it again," Ola sighs, showing the screen to Jide. "I told her no sugar for the baby until he's two. I walk into the living room, and she’s dipping a biscuit in tea and feeding him like it’s a sacred rite. When I corrected her, she said, 'I raised you on tea and bread, and you’re a CEO today. Is your Google wisdom better than my gray hair?' How do I win this without breaking her heart—or my son's health?" ​Elder Ephraim chuckles from his corner. "Ola, you’re trying to win a war where the prize is a child who needs both of you. You have the 'New Knowledge,' but she has the 'Old Love.' If you fight for authority, you might win the battle but lose the village." ​ ...
Read more