THE TOPIC TODAY: Punishment vs Consequence Fear might correct a misbehaviour but never teaches judgment. Does your child stop their behavior because they understand the danger, or because they fear your hand?• When you "discipline, are you releasing your own anger or teaching your child a skill? The Big Question: If you weren't there to watch them, would your child still make the right choice?
The mood at Ola’s house is a bit tense. Ola’s youngest daughter was in a neighbour's house and it was reported that one of the boys was seen touching her inappropriatly. Ola is already reaching for his belt, his face flushed. "You’ll learn today!" he shouts. "I’ve told you a thousand times not to go playing inside the house with those boys!"
Jide gently puts a hand on Ola’s shoulder. "Ola, wait. If you hit her now, all she learns is how to hide, duck and how to fear your belt. She won't learn why going there is dangerous or how to be careful. You’re treating the symptom, not the ailment. You’re punishing her, but you aren't giving her a consequence."
Play Summary: The "Switch" of Control
In many homes, "discipline" is synonymous with making a child suffer so they don't repeat a mistake (the idea of spare the rod and spoil the child)
This is Punishment. It works - but only while the punisher is present. The moment the threat is gone, the behaviour returns because the child never developed judgment. Consequences, on the other hand, are the logical "price" of a choice. They don't aim to hurt; they aim to teach. When we choose fear over logic, we raise youths who are experts at "not getting caught" rather than experts at "doing what is right."
Pain vs. Perspective: The Shift from Fear to Judgment
Character Key:
• Ola: The "Reactive" Parent; focuses on immediate compliance through fear.
• Jide: The "Logical" Dad; uses the Nigerian road behavior analogy to explain external vs. internal control.
• Jennifer (Psychologist): Explaining how fear shuts down the learning brain.
• Nne: The "Fixer"; focusing on logical outcomes.
• Elder Ephraim: The "Sage"; on building the internal moral compass.
JENNIFER:
Ola, when you use fear, you trigger the child's "Lower Brain" - the survival center. In this state, the brain literally cannot reflect or learn. The child isn't thinking, "I should be more careful next time." They are thinking, "How do I survive this anger?"
JIDE:
Look at our roads in Lagos. Drivers are "well-behaved" only when they see the VIO or a police officer. That is Punishment-based behaviour. The moment the officer turns their back, the madness returns because there is no internal judgment - only fear of the fine. We don't want our children to be like those drivers.
NNE:
Punishment is like taking a painkiller for a broken leg. It stops the crying (the symptom), but it doesn't set the bone (the root cause).
The Great Divide: Punishment vs. Consequence
ELDER EPHRAIM:
A consequence must "fit the crime." If a child breaks a toy, taking away their dinner is punishment - it has nothing to do with the toy. But if they break the toy and then have to help pay for a new one or lose the privilege of playing with it, that is a Logical Consequence.
OLA:
So I just let it go?
NNE:
No! You stay calm. If you are angry, it’s probably punishment. Instead, try:
• Provide Choices: "You can play outside or run outside. If you choose to go inside, make sure you’re not there alone because if you should get hurt in any way, it'd be your word against theirs. You do not want to get hurt or, be shamed, do you?"
• Emphasize Learning: After the report of the incident, ask: "What can we do differently next time so everyone stays safe?"
• Natural Outcomes: "Since it happened and you did not like what happened to you, you’ll need to discuss it with your mother when she returns, and she'd tell you how best to respond next time or if ever such thing happens again."
The Inquiry: Building the Internal Compass
The Group concludes that fear is a temporary fix that creates a permanent distance between parent and child.
• Fear vs. Respect: Fear says, "I won't do it because I’ll get hit." Respect says, "I won't do it because I understand it's wrong."
• The "Caught" Culture: Punishment teaches children to be better liars. Consequences teach them to be better people.
• Proactive over Reactive: Plan the consequences ahead of time so the child knows the "price" of their choices before they make them.
Jide gently puts a hand on Ola’s shoulder. "Ola, wait. If you hit her now, all she learns is how to hide, duck and how to fear your belt. She won't learn why going there is dangerous or how to be careful. You’re treating the symptom, not the ailment. You’re punishing her, but you aren't giving her a consequence."
Play Summary: The "Switch" of Control
In many homes, "discipline" is synonymous with making a child suffer so they don't repeat a mistake (the idea of spare the rod and spoil the child)
This is Punishment. It works - but only while the punisher is present. The moment the threat is gone, the behaviour returns because the child never developed judgment. Consequences, on the other hand, are the logical "price" of a choice. They don't aim to hurt; they aim to teach. When we choose fear over logic, we raise youths who are experts at "not getting caught" rather than experts at "doing what is right."
Pain vs. Perspective: The Shift from Fear to Judgment
Character Key:
• Ola: The "Reactive" Parent; focuses on immediate compliance through fear.
• Jide: The "Logical" Dad; uses the Nigerian road behavior analogy to explain external vs. internal control.
• Jennifer (Psychologist): Explaining how fear shuts down the learning brain.
• Nne: The "Fixer"; focusing on logical outcomes.
• Elder Ephraim: The "Sage"; on building the internal moral compass.
JENNIFER:
Ola, when you use fear, you trigger the child's "Lower Brain" - the survival center. In this state, the brain literally cannot reflect or learn. The child isn't thinking, "I should be more careful next time." They are thinking, "How do I survive this anger?"
JIDE:
Look at our roads in Lagos. Drivers are "well-behaved" only when they see the VIO or a police officer. That is Punishment-based behaviour. The moment the officer turns their back, the madness returns because there is no internal judgment - only fear of the fine. We don't want our children to be like those drivers.
NNE:
Punishment is like taking a painkiller for a broken leg. It stops the crying (the symptom), but it doesn't set the bone (the root cause).
The Great Divide: Punishment vs. Consequence
ELDER EPHRAIM:
A consequence must "fit the crime." If a child breaks a toy, taking away their dinner is punishment - it has nothing to do with the toy. But if they break the toy and then have to help pay for a new one or lose the privilege of playing with it, that is a Logical Consequence.
OLA:
So I just let it go?
NNE:
No! You stay calm. If you are angry, it’s probably punishment. Instead, try:
• Provide Choices: "You can play outside or run outside. If you choose to go inside, make sure you’re not there alone because if you should get hurt in any way, it'd be your word against theirs. You do not want to get hurt or, be shamed, do you?"
• Emphasize Learning: After the report of the incident, ask: "What can we do differently next time so everyone stays safe?"
• Natural Outcomes: "Since it happened and you did not like what happened to you, you’ll need to discuss it with your mother when she returns, and she'd tell you how best to respond next time or if ever such thing happens again."
The Inquiry: Building the Internal Compass
The Group concludes that fear is a temporary fix that creates a permanent distance between parent and child.
• Fear vs. Respect: Fear says, "I won't do it because I’ll get hit." Respect says, "I won't do it because I understand it's wrong."
• The "Caught" Culture: Punishment teaches children to be better liars. Consequences teach them to be better people.
• Proactive over Reactive: Plan the consequences ahead of time so the child knows the "price" of their choices before they make them.
Comments